Julian Critchley and legalisation of drugs
I've thought for a long time that the so-called 'war on drugs' is misconceived and an inevitable failure so the only logical course is controlled legalisation. I'm very glad to hear that Julian Critchley, a former civil servant who once ran the Cabinet's anti-drug unit, has publicly said that decriminalisation is the only sane way forward. The parallel with prohibition in the USA is obvious.
Comments
Display comments as Linear | Threaded
david hill on :
Overall Critchley and his team were responsible for not reducing the drug scourge because they never opened their eyes. Indeed, responsible for not even trying and causing indirectly the suffering of hundreds of thousands in the UK and their families. The combined situation affecting millions.
Therefore he and his team were/are a complete failure for Britain.
Dr David Hill
World Innovation Foundation Charity (WIFC)
Bern, Switzerland
Mike on :
However, this would have to be coupled with serious resources going into helping existing addicts come off, no bureaucratic messing and no waiting lists.
Graham Mitchell on :
1) The prohibition of recreational drugs has provoked the biggest world wide explosion in organised crime since the prohibition of alcohol in the USA in the 1920's
2)The majority of deaths are caused by consumers not knowing exactly what they are using.
3) Simply because they are banned they become a fashionable fad instead of a stupid way of showing off.
4) The proliferation caused by the dealers giving the kids free samples would disappear if there were no commercial incentive for them to do so.
5) The massive savings achieved would turn into a revenue earner if the various substances were moderately taxed.
6) Savings and taxes would more than finance a serious drug dependency unit to also cover tobacco and alcohol.
I have many more instances where society would benefit from this approach and would suggest that a serious study be made to weigh the benefits of this approach against the disadvantages.
I am sure the benefits outweigh the downside by a considerable margin financially, danger to society and even ethically.
The biggest obstacles are 1) The public kneejerk reaction to the proposal and 2)the politcal reluctance to take a stand on something which has been obvious to me for many years
If you like to enter into a dialogue in respect of the above I am at your disposal. I am semi retired and would happily spare as much time as it takes to give our ideas some momentum now that a voice in the wilderness has been heard. I sent a copy of my thesis to several chief constables and got some very snotty replies as you can imagine,
Yours sincerely,
Graham Mitchell
The Oast House
The Vern
Marden
Herefordshire
HR1 3EX
Office 01568 700112
Home 01568 797822
Graham Mitchell on :
That is the suggestion but if you go the medical supervision route you will still be left with a market place for the illegal stuff, not as big a market admittedly but my idea was to allow a dispensing chemist to issue whatever and give a verbal warning on side effects plus the usual flags on the packet "Smoking Kills" etc --really goes back to treating people like adults--they might actually respond plus I think we should all decide on our own exit route--mine's alcohol !
The main thing I can't get a handle on is how you start applying the pressure on the polticians to change the law ?
Any ideas ?
Graham Mitchell
(Mitch)
mike cadoux on :
Policy would have to evolve in light of experience.